Academic article review

Academic article review

Homepage > Writing Samples > Academic Writing Samples > Review Samples > Article Review Samples. Sort by: Most Popular Latest Article Review Samples. Reviewing an article is not as easy as it sounds: it requires a critical mind and doing some extra research. Check out our article review samples to gain a better understanding of how to review articles yourself. Customer Satisfaction Still /5 Google Scholar provides a simple way to broadly search for scholarly literature. Search across a wide variety of disciplines and sources: articles, theses, books, abstracts and court opinions Summarising and paraphrasing are essential skills for academic writing and in particular, the critical review. To summarise means to reduce a text to its main points and its most important ideas. The length of your summary for a critical review should only be about one quarter to one third of the whole critical review. The best way to summarise

How to Review a Journal Article: 13 Steps (with Pictures)

Academic review journals might not be doing articles any favors, academic article review. Being curated into an academic review journal is, on average, detrimental for scientific publications and leads to a dramatic overall decrease in future citations, according to a new study suggesting that academic review articles engage in a sort of "creative destruction.

Academic review articles are articles that summarize previously published academic studies in order to paint, in broad strokes, a holistic picture and explain the current state of understanding in a particular field of knowledge.

Academic journals that curate and summarize these previously published works are known as review journals. The studypublished March 18 in the American Sociological Reviewis the first of its kind to quantify the effects of being included in an academic review article. With data from Clarivate's Web of Science citation databasethe researchers were able to examine a dataset that yielded approximately 5. The researchers of this study initially approached the topic of review journals with a "black-box" theoretical framework, said Peter McMahan, academic article review, a co-author of the paper and assistant professor of sociology at McGill University.

However, a academic article review look at academic article review journals revealed that the work they were performing was actually more robust than originally thought. But they don't just do this by simplifying that down to a single finding or a single punchline. Instead, these review journals create a simplified version of the large scale arguments, divisions and dichotomies that are going on within an area: "Something legible and coherent that you can understand the large strokes of without diving into the nitty-gritty details that the small scale domain experts are very concerned with," according to McMahan.

The researchers determined, then, that review journals perform imperative work in academia that pushes scholarly discourse forward — but it may come at a cost. In academia, "There's this common idea that you'll hear people talk about: Reviews poaching citations from people — whether they poach attention or promote attention," McMahan said.

Using a hierarchical negative-binomial model, the researchers found that articles cited in a review, academic article review, on average, saw a significant reduction in the number of future citations, with the median article receiving This finding suggests that review articles divert attention away from the original study and replace it with the review article instead.

This was a very significant, very visible drop-off once we actually came up with the model and estimated it. The researchers also noticed another surprising finding: "In general, almost academic article review articles included in a review dropped in their citations, but we noticed that there were a few articles all the time, with every one of these reviews, that would get this massive boost instead," McMahan said.

The researchers found that a small subset of cited articles that bridged disconnected research clusters received increased citational attention after being included in a review article, and the articles receiving the largest boost in citations "are those that draw connections between research clusters that were previously seen as residing in distinct scientific domains," according to the researchers. Bridge articles perform a unifying process that allows the scientific community to use these articles as the linchpins — the exemplars — to talk about a particular set of research as a coherent whole, according to McMahan.

To illustrate, the researchers pointed to a review articletitled "Integrated Assessment Models of Global Climate Change. The study found that a handful of bridge articles with the largest boost saw an increase of nearly seven times the future citations than would otherwise be expected. McMahan cautioned, though, that this research studied only academic attention using citations as a proxy; it does not determine the quality of that attention, whether positive or negative, academic article review.

Since the publishing of the study, McMahan told The Academic Times that people have interpreted the study to be showing the vices of review journals, but that is not how the researchers themselves see it, academic article review. The study "Creative Destruction: The Structural Consequences of Scientific Curation," published March 18 in the American Sociological Academic article review, was co-authored by Peter McMahan, McGill University; and Daniel McFarland, Stanford University.

By Howard Hardee. By Ariane Lange. By Theo Wayt. By Beth Newhart. By Nick Gallagher. By Asher Jones. By Miles Martin.

By Zack Fishman. Log in. Academic review articles lead to fewer citations for underlying research By Marcos Cabello. Twitter Linkedin Facebook Email Print. You've reached the limit of three articles per month for unregistered users.

You may continue reading for free by logging in below. Sign up for Academic Times' free daily briefing. Continue with Google Subscribe with Google. Email address. No, thank you. By subscribing, you agree to our terms of service. First Name. Last Name. Subscribe to our free daily newsletter to stay up to date on groundbreaking research. By creating an account, you agree to The Academic Times' Terms of Use academic article review, Privacy Policyand Cookie Policy. Enter verification code We emailed you a verification code, academic article review.

If you haven't received it, please check your bulk, junk, or SPAM folder Enter code here Verifying Bad token, try again, academic article review. Having issues receiving the email? please contact us. Logged in successfully Welcome to The Academic Times Subscription complete Welcome to The Academic Times. We use cookies to improve your experience on our academic article review and to show you relevant advertising.

How to Review a Research Paper

, time: 7:18

Academic review articles lead to fewer citations for underlying research - The Academic Times

Homepage > Writing Samples > Academic Writing Samples > Review Samples > Article Review Samples. Sort by: Most Popular Latest Article Review Samples. Reviewing an article is not as easy as it sounds: it requires a critical mind and doing some extra research. Check out our article review samples to gain a better understanding of how to review articles yourself. Customer Satisfaction Still /5 An article review should include a description of the topic, main points discussed in the article, the purpose of writing, conclusions made by the writer. In the article review, you are to indicate what’s new has been stated/ revealed there. Related topics should be mentioned as well Summarising and paraphrasing are essential skills for academic writing and in particular, the critical review. To summarise means to reduce a text to its main points and its most important ideas. The length of your summary for a critical review should only be about one quarter to one third of the whole critical review. The best way to summarise