Rogerian model of argument

Rogerian model of argument

The Rogerian model of argument was developed by Carl R. Rogers to analyze an argument while providing a middle ground between opposing parties. This model works on collaboration and cooperation. It acknowledges that an argument can be looked at from different standpoints. The objectives of the Rogerian model are 1/10/ · Rogerian argument is a negotiating strategy in which common goals are identified and opposing views are described as objectively as possible in an effort to establish common ground and reach an agreement. It is also known as Rogerian rhetoric, Rogerian argumentation, Rogerian persuasion, and empathic blogger.com by: 17/2/ · Presupposing that common grounds should be located to address any problem, the Rogerian argument model can be viewed as a milder approach to a specific dilemma

Rogerian Argument - Excelsior College OWL

Rogerian Argument Model. Based on Carl Rogers's studies in psychotherapy, rogerian model of argument. Use the Rogerian model when your audience is hostile and non-conciliatory. This method is also known as the non-adversarial or WIN-WIN argument model.

This method is used in labor-management disagreements, international peace treaties, rogerian model of argument, marriage counseling, and other highly contentious settings. Follow these steps:. Discuss the issue, what's at stake and any context required for your readers to understand rogerian model of argument argument.

Articulate this in objective language--your intent here is not to prejudice the reader but rather to educate and to verify that you as arguer understand the opposing view correctly. While probably not done completely objectively, this is an important stage in the process: simply explain what reasons you have for choosing your stance. Whereas the "Proof" stage in the classical model is key for success, here the need to find common ground is essential for the success of the Rogerian method.

On what can you and your opponent agree? In light of step four, craft a resolution that borrows the best from both sides and offers a negotiated settlement somewhere in the middle.

Three Types of Arguments: Classical, Rogerian, Toulmin

, time: 13:58

3 Types of Argument: Definition and Examples

Rogerian Method Most of the time we think of arguments as adversarial, taking place between people who fundamentally disagree. One will be right and the other wrong; one wins and the other loses. This works in legal systems as well as in the context of many other situations 17/2/ · Presupposing that common grounds should be located to address any problem, the Rogerian argument model can be viewed as a milder approach to a specific dilemma 9/2/ · Starting with the Rogerian Model Start with a common ground The virtue of finding common ground is that a person can isolate and resolve the points of opposition more effectively after identifying the points of agreement because the hostility of the audience has been reduced by showing and understanding of the audience’s perspective. 5