Writing a good paper

Writing a good paper

18/1/ · The abstract is a summary of all that has been written in the paper. A good abstract should be between and words. It must be concise, straight to the point, and easy to read. An abstract contains the motivation for writing the paper, a short description of the work done, and the conclusions arrived at. It is at the point the reader will determine whether to go on reading the paper or drop it 10/5/ · Every paper assignment is a great opportunity to learn how to tell your stories. Moreover, writing clearly necessitates thinking clearly, so the process of writing (and revising) helps you to sort A good paper in the JMPT makes a contribution to knowledge by providing insights into the influence of a process on material in a way that will be useful to others in future. The knowledge may be coded as an equation, or formulated in some concise statements, but must always be supported by experimental or theoretical evidence that allows the reader to judge its value

How to Write a Paper: 13 Steps (with Pictures) - wikiHow

Once production of your article has started, you can track the status of your article via Track Your Accepted Article. Help expand a public dataset of research that support the SDGs. This guide proposes a model for writing a good paper, and gives some advice on writing style. A good paper in the JMPT makes a contribution to knowledge by providing insights into the influence of a process on material in a way that will be useful to others in future.

The knowledge may be coded as an equation, or formulated in some concise statements, but must always be supported by experimental or theoretical evidence that allows the reader to judge its value. Accordingly, writing a good paper, we propose here a model of a good paper as a defence case in a court trial in which the authors are accused that their work has no value.

In writing the paper, the authors must anticipate all of the arguments that the prosecution the reviewers may put to them, and respond to them with evidence. The sections listed below are not intended to define the section headings of the paper — but we believe that a good paper will cover all parts of the argument set out here.

What is the context for the research work? Analysis of existing work. There are two purposes to examining previous work: to summarise previous work in the area what knowledge exists in the area and is relevant to the need defined aboveand to demonstrate that a knowledge gap exists precisely what is the gap between the defined need and existing literature that this paper will attempt to fill? A postulated model, theory, technological innovation, experiment, operating method or framework of analysis that will in some way contribute to filling the gap.

The paper then tests the hypothesis that the proposal fills the gap identified writing a good paper the analysis of existing work, writing a good paper. Writing a good paper of test and implementation. Given the above hypothesis, what is the most fair and objective way to test whether the proposal fills the knowledge gap? How can the hypothesis be proved or disproved?

Typically this is achieved by comparison with experimental data, or with existing models, writing a good paper, but it is important that the chosen test would be seen as valid even by someone initially sceptical about the proposal. Results and evaluation. The results should be presented writing a good paper clearly and objectively as possible supported by a careful evaluation. Discussion and conclusions. To what extent does the proposal close the gap identified in the review of previous work?

Based on the experience of evaluating the proposal described in this paper, what extensions or related approaches would be worth investigating? What are the wider implications of the work: writing a good paper this investigation suggest the use of other solutions to this problem?

Are there other problems for which this solution might also be useful? Based on the work described in this paper, are there other proposals that might usefully be tested in future work? Although the abstract appears first to the reader, it should be written after the paper is finished and is a concise summary of the entire paper.

A good way to construct an abstract is with a one or two sentence summary of each of the above six themes. Not all papers have six sections, as some of the sections would be very short if the above scheme were followed identically. However, most papers could be organised to cover all aspects of this argument, and we commend it as a working template.

Review papers are written in quite a different way, and will be structured by the subject being discussed. A good review writing a good paper not just a catalogue, but adds value to the readers by demonstrating a structure for knowledge in writing a good paper area being described — that allows clear evaluation of where work has been largely completed, where opportunities for new work clearly exist, and where different approaches have been developed, a review should contrast them clearly and with fairness.

Home Journals Journal of Materials Processing Technology Policies and Guidelines Guide to Writing a Good Paper for the Journal of Materials Processing Technology. Submit Your Paper. Supports Open Access. View Articles. Track Your Paper Check submitted paper Check the writing a good paper of your submitted manuscript in the submission system Track accepted paper Once production of your article has started, you can track the status of your article via Track Your Accepted Article.

Order Journal. Journal Metrics CiteScore : 8. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years e. Impact Factor: 4. Journal Citation Reports Clarivate Analytics, writing a good paper, 5-Year Impact Factor: 4. Journal Citation Reports Clarivate Analytics, Source Normalized Impact per Paper SNIP : 2. SCImago Journal Rank SJR : 1. View More on Journal Insights.

Your Research Data Share your research data Data in Brief co-submission MethodsX co-submission. Related Links Researcher Academy Author Resources Try out personalized alert features. Guide to Writing a Good Paper for the Journal of Materials Processing Technology, writing a good paper. Prosecution case: This research is not important The problem is too specific and clearly does not lead to transferable knowledge Analysis of existing work.

Prosecution case: The claimed knowledge gap does not exist— it has already been filled. Prosecution case: The test does not prove anything The test is wrong The test is over simplified The test is false — the outcome will not prove anything because it assumes the proposal is true Results and evaluation.

Prosecution case: The results are too specific and apply only to one situation Your interpretation of the results is wrong You claim more than you have proved Discussion and conclusions, writing a good paper.

It is important to write the paper so that the reader finds it complete and compelling. To help achieve this: the introduction should motivate the reader to read the rest of the paper and demonstrate why the ensuing structure is logical; the first paragraph of each section should motivate the reader to read the section, and should present a clear structure for the information contained in it; the first sentence of each paragraph should motivate and structure the rest of the paragraph, writing a good paper.

First paragraphs and first sentences generally do not include references as their purpose is to give structure for the reader, not to present new information. Each paragraph should have a single purpose, writing a good paper. If you find yourself beginning paragraphs in this way, go back to the first paragraph of the section and re- define the structure.

Each of these is examined in turn, considering the cost of implementation, the range of skills required, and their likely benefits. References in papers work best when the reference is used as the subject of a verb.

Long sentences are harder to understand than short ones. The clearest sentences are often the simplest. English is built around sentences that have the structure: subject-verb-object. Lack of clarity often occurs when this order is ignored. It is surprisingly easy to write a sentence with a long sub-clause between the subject and verb of the main clause, and sometimes the object of the main clause is missing altogether.

If you realise that your writing is becoming unclear, it sometimes helps to see if that sentence or paragraph would be clearer if written in reverse order. Aim to be concise. Academic writing is formal. The reader will examine your writing to see if you have provided evidence to support your claims.

Your own opinion about the value of your claims is rarely significant. Therefore, writing in the 3rd person is generally more effective than writing in the 1st person. The most writing a good paper failing in academic writing is claiming that the paper is more significant than it is. Be precise in describing the conclusions that may safely be drawn from the evidence you have provided — even if they appear to you to be small or insignificant.

Return to Policies and Guidelines. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. Authors Author Information Pack Submit Your Paper Track Your Paper Researcher Academy Rights and Permissions Elsevier Author Services Webshop Editorial Policy Authors Good Practice Guide Support Center, writing a good paper. Editors Publishing Ethics Resource Kit Guest Editors Support Center. Reviewers Reviewer Guidelines Log in as Reviewer Reviewers Good Practice Guide Reviewer Recognition Support Center.

Advertisers Media Information.

How to Write an Effective Research Paper

, time: 1:11:56

Seven Tips for Writing a Good Paper | Psychology Today

22/11/ · Your thesis statement should match the type of paper you’re writing. Invest time in writing your thesis statement—it’s the main idea of your paper, from which everything else flows. Without a well-thought-out thesis statement, your paper is likely to end up jumbled and with an unclear purpose. Here’s more guidance from Purdue OWL. The Outline 18/1/ · The abstract is a summary of all that has been written in the paper. A good abstract should be between and words. It must be concise, straight to the point, and easy to read. An abstract contains the motivation for writing the paper, a short description of the work done, and the conclusions arrived at. It is at the point the reader will determine whether to go on reading the paper or drop it A good paper in the JMPT makes a contribution to knowledge by providing insights into the influence of a process on material in a way that will be useful to others in future. The knowledge may be coded as an equation, or formulated in some concise statements, but must always be supported by experimental or theoretical evidence that allows the reader to judge its value